American Government (8th edition) by Gitelson, Dudley and Dubnick
    Purchase at: Amazon;

  • Randi Art
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from randubnick. Make your own badge here.
  • Draw Breath (Friends CiarĂ¡n and Isabel)
  • Sociable Geek (Friend Stephen)
  • Meditations71 (Friend Stefan)
  • Slugger O'Toole
  • Ideal Government Project
  • Thur's Templates

Sunday, October 29, 2006

Must read! Must see!

Oh, what to do on rainy and blustery days in New England?

Well, there are great things to read and watch.

My reading began with a cup of coffee and the latest issue of the New York Review of Books. It contains a terrific piece by Garry Wills showing how pervasive evangelicalism is in the Bush administration -- a clear example of the masterful use of patronage personnel policies with implications that go well beyond policymaking. Wills makes the case that the federal government is now engaged in a broad range of "faith-based" initiates -- faith-based social services, faith-based, justice, faith-based science/health, and faith-based war. A brilliant and scary bit of political analysis....

Having moved on from coffee, and between loads of laundry and various e-mail exchanges, I picked up the remote and worked my way around to C-SPAN 2 where Andrew Sullivan and David Brooks were engaged in a lively discussion about Sullivan's most recent book (The Conservative Soul) in front of an audience at the libertarian-focused CATO Institute.

This was without doubt one of the most interesting exchanges I've seen among conservatives, and within the hour I ordered the book in question along with Sullivan's earlier work, Virtually Normal.

If only I can be so lucky each time I turn on the boob tube!

Time passes. The rain is gone, the sun is out -- and the winds are gusting up to 60 mph. Seems like another cup of coffee and the Sunday NY Times are in order before I venture out....

Read more!

Sunday, October 22, 2006

Project and remarks

Just completed my contributions to the 8th edition of American Government, and I think it is looking pretty good. Since my responsibility is for the non-political chapters (I do constitution, federalism, bureaucracy and two policy chapters), unless some major constitutional crisis or world shaking events occur before the November elections, that should be it for me. My co-author colleagues (Alan Gitelson and Robert Dudley), however, still have some gaps to fill once the mid-term elections are over, and then the book goes to press. That is one extended project out of the way for now -- although preparing for the next edition is an ongoing effort....

Also posted my brief remarks made at last week's meeting of the National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (quite a mouthful). The panel was on the future of the MPA degree, and I turned to my concerns about our preparedness for the coming of the nomadic gatherers of knowledge....

Read more!

Saturday, October 21, 2006

Filling the Void with Autism and Mayberry Machiavellis

I now realize that my early daily obsession with blogging while I was in Northern Ireland was driven, in large part, by my need to fill the vacuum of not being in the classroom. I suspect I just have to have an audience to "profess" to, and the blog filled that function quite well.

But now that I am back in the classroom weekly I find myself without the energy to blog -- I just use up all my blather on those poor folks who actually pay for the privilege...:-)

I am now on my way back from a conference in Minneapolis (literally -- I am writing this in the Cleveland airport lounge waiting for my connection to Boston), and having been away from any convenient victims... I mean students... I have the urge to blog once again. As it happens I just listened to a couple of podcasts that cry out for some blogger attention.

The first was a podcast discussing a study empirically linking the growth of cable TV with the increase in reports of autism. This may sound a bit absurd at first, but it really is fascinating stuff, and right in line with some ideas I have been working about the impact of media on generational mindsets. But even without that excuse, if this study is credible it will have major implications in all sorts of ways....

The other podcast was the weekly "gabfest" on that is taped every Friday. This week's included discussion of new book by David Kuo, number two in the White House office overseeing faith-based initiatives when it first got off the ground in the pre-9/11 Bush Administration. I had seen some TV coverage of this by Keith Olbermann (whose staff obtained a pre-release copy by asking for one at a local DC bookstore...), but the attraction to me were the things said about a friend, John DiIulio.

DiIulio is perhaps one of the sharpest political scientists of his generation -- an individual who combines brilliance with energy and commitment. He was appointed head of the faith-based office when it was first established, and he worked incredibly hard pushing the initiative -- only to be frustrated to a point that impacted on his health. (As far as I know, he is the only public official to announce he was leaving his position because he was seriously overweight -- somewhat humorous, yes, but serious to those of us who saw the visible impact of the job on him in such a short time...). John resigned, and was soon (and is now) ensconced at the University of Pennsylvania.

In 2002 or so he got entangled in a bit of media hype when a letter he wrote to a reporter was quoted and then put on the web -- a letter that is best known for his labelling his former colleagues in the West Wing's domestic policy offices as Mayberry Machiavellis -- a label that seems to have stuck (see here). John almost immediately issued a public apology for the comments and has since been rather quiet about what happened -- almost reclusive. Given that context, the comments of the gabfest folks are very interesting, some implying John was silenced by pressure from a major UPenn donor.

Frankly, I don't buy it -- those who know John would find that hard to believe. More likely is the fact that John DiIulio is a man of considerable integrity, and that he truly felt that he had spoken out of turn by publicly characterizing his former colleagues as such. I suspect we will hear more from him at some future point when he feels the time is right. In the meanwhile, John stays high on my list of truly sincere and credible people....

Read more!